Survival and proliferation of bacteria depend on their expressing the right amounts of the right genes at the right time. However, what is “right” at any given time-point will vary with the environmental conditions and the specific growth phase. Bacteria often respond to these changing environmental stimuli by switching the expression of specific genes “on” or “off”. To ensure that target gene expression is optimal, will require finetuning of the regulatory parameters that control the switch, and this fine-tuning can affect each individual step of gene expression. In bacteria, gene expression is frequently controlled by proteins that activate or repress transcription by binding to specific DNA sequences close to a promoter. The DNA binding activity of these transcription factors is triggered by small molecules or, less often, by protein-protein interactions. Tet repressor is a paradigm for a bacterial transcription factor that responds directly to an environmental signal by binding a small molecule. TetR regulates transcription of the resistance protein TetA in at least 14 different efflux-type tetracycline resistance determinants found predominantly in Gram-negative bacteria. Repression by TetR has to be tight, because overproduction or constitutive expression of the membrane transporter TetA strongly reduces bacterial fitness. But, at the same time, induction must be sensitive to ensure that TetA is translated before the antibiotic reaches an intracellular level that inhibits translation. Although seemingly conflicting, these requirements are met by the exceptionally high specificity of TetR for its cognate binding site tetO over non-specific DNA and by its unusually high affinity for tetracyclines. Such favorable properties have made TetR a very popular tool for many different applications, including conditional gene expression in both pro- and eukaryotes, overexpression of heterologous proteins or artificial genetic circuits in synthetic biology with highly diverse architectures. So far, all applications using Tet regulation have relied on tetracycline or its analogs as inducers. The recent discovery that peptides can also specifically induce TetR when they are fused to a carrier protein added a new quality to Tet regulation. These inducing peptides, called TIP, bind to the tetracycline-binding pocket of TetR and elicit an allosteric conformational Lomitapide Mesylate change that leads to the complete loss of DNAbinding activity. This turned TetR from an exclusively small-molecule-controlled protein into a downstream effector in a protein signal transduction pathway. Examples of protein-induced regulation of gene expression are not so common in bacteria, but have been found among the major transcription factor families. Information transfer by protein-mediated signal transduction not only introduces new ways to manipulate TetR-based genetic networks in synthetic biology. It also allows to gather proteomic data by determining protein expression profiles after tagging many different proteins with TIP and monitoring their expression by genetic LOUREIRIN-B readout of the TetR-controlled reporter gene. Compared with the intensely studied and well-characterized induction of gene expression by tetracyclines, the parameters for sensitive and efficient control of a Tet-regulated reporter gene by a protein-based inducer are still largely unknown. While the basic functionality of TIP-mediated induction of TetR has been demonstrated in Escherichia coli and in Staphylococcus aureus, major obstacles must still be overcome, if this system is to be used effectively in more sophisticated applications, like those mentioned above. In the examples published so far, efficient induction of TetR was only achieved after strong overproduction of the TIP-containing fusion protein from a multicopy plasmid.
Monthly Archives: June 2019
The order of the start arms alternated in a pseudorandom manner so that the frequency of arms was balanced across
In fact, a Butenafine hydrochloride recent study using a chronic model of alcohol exposure in rats reported enhanced learning and memory in rats following lower levels of chronic alcohol exposure, but reduced learning and memory at higher levels. However, to our knowledge, there is little evidence of enhanced learning and memory in humans following excessive and repeated episodes of binge-like alcohol exposure. In contrast, we suggest that the CIE-induced alterations in STDP we observed here are an aberrant homeostatic response. This change may lead to aberrant metaplasticity of NMDAR dependent synaptic plasticity, which could promote dysfunctional reorganization of prefrontal neuronal networks. The PFC mediates executive functions entailing the coordination, manipulation, and flexible use of information from multiple memory systems. Reversal learning requires flexible switching between cues within a particular stimulus dimension, and it invokes multiple executive functions, including attention, working memory and response inhibition. Perseverative errors serve as an index of how readily animals are able to inhibit the use of the now incorrect strategy and instead attend to previously irrelevant stimuli in order to obtain a goal. Distinct regions of the PFC play a critical role in facilitating different forms of behavioral flexibility. Lesions or blockade of NMDARs in the mPFC has been shown to impair set-shifting and produce a selective increase in perseverative errors, whereas the learning and maintenance of a new strategy remains unaffected, indicating that the mPFC plays a selective role in suppressing the use of a previously relevant but now incorrect strategy. In contrast, reversal learning is impaired by lesions of the orbitofrontal region of the PFC, which have no effect on set-shifting functions. Floresco and Magyar have argued that LOUREIRIN-B attentional set-shifting is a more complex process than reversal learning. This is because successful attentional set-shifting requires both the suppression of a previously learned strategy and attending to a previously irrelevant stimulus, thus requiring that attention be paid to multiple aspects of the environment. In the present study, we found a dissociation of the effects of CIE on these behavioral measures of cognitive control, suggesting that alcohol exposure disrupts the ability to shift between attentional sets, but does not interfere with hierarchically less complex reversal learning. The CIE-induced deficit in set-shifting was the result of increased perseverative responding and was not due to impairment in the initial acquisition of either a response or visual discrimination. Thus these findings are consistent with the idea that CIE exposure reduces the ability of the mPFC to flexibly modulate behavior during changing environmental situations that require increased attentional control. Medial PFC networks control executive functions and behavioral flexibility, and in humans they may regulate cognitive control over alcohol intake. Thus the CIEinduced changes in glutamatergic transmission in mPFC pyramidal cells that we describe here may contribute to the cognitive impairments and loss of behavioral control seen in alcoholdependent subjects. On the day following turn bias, mice were trained on a response discrimination task. For this task, the mice were required to always turn in the opposite direction of its turn bias to obtain reward. Mice started from one of 3 arms to discourage them from using an allocentric spatial strategy to locate the food.
As a consequence of APP in the functional effects of this mutation in the context of hNGF or of hNGFP61S
The neuroprotective and anti-amyloidogenic properties of Chlorhexidine hydrochloride hNGFP61S/R100E mutant demonstrated in APPxPS1 transgenic mice are noteworthy. In this mouse model, the expression of mutated human APP and PS1 is the first cause of neurodegeneration. The administration of hNGFP61S/R100E was performed at an age when memory deficits have not yet started and amyloid plaque deposition is in the initial phase. This allowed to study the effects of hNGFP61S/R100E at very early stages of the progressive neurodegeneration, showing that in APPxPS1 the hNGFP61S/R100E mutant was able to prevent learning and memory defects and to greatly reduce Ab deposition. In addition, by using a conformation specific antibody anti-Ab oligomers, we demonstrated that hNGFP61S/R100E prevents or reduces the accumulation of Ab oligomers, considered the earliest and most synaptotoxic forms of Ab. Thus, hNGFP61S/R100E exerts an anti-amyloidogenic effect in vivo, in a disease-relevant FAD-based model. From a mechanistic point of view, this might involve a generalized neuroprotective activity by the neurotrophin, at multiple levels, by slowing the generation of Ab peptide and Ab oligomers, by reducing the microgliosis and astrogliosis and/or, possibly, by increasing the clearance of Ab peptides, thereby leading to the observed reduced plaque load and Ab oligomer levels. The observed effects on astrocytes and microglia are consistent with both these cell types expressing TrkA and p75NTR NGF receptors, in normal and pathological conditions. Reactive astrocytes, present in APP xPS1 brain due to amyloid pathology, also express higher levels of TrkA in human AD. We found a reduction of both microgliosis and Atropine sulfate astrocytosis in hNGFP61S/R100E treated APPxPS1 brains, suggesting that the ensuing reduced neuroinflammation might contribute to remove an environment permissive for the buildup of amyloid pathology and neurodegeneration. Further studies are required to verify whether the activation of TrkA signaling by hNGFP61S/R100E might regulate the known mechanisms of internalization and Ab degradation by astrocytes. The selective modulation of TrkA and p75NTR downstream signaling pathways might also contribute to the neuroprotective action of hNGFP61S/R100E. Indeed, while the activation of the Akt signaling pathway, which is preserved by hNGFR100 mutants, is required for a neuroprotective action and is downregulated by soluble Ab oligomers, Erks and c-jun activation have been linked to neurodegeneration and cell death. Oligomeric assemblies of Ab have been found to up-regulate phospho-Erks, which, in turn, can lead to abnormal phosphorylation of tau, generation of dystrophic neurites and progressive neuronal degeneration. Similarly, up-regulation of c-jun has been linked to cell death and tau phosphorylation in AD, and its down-regulation prevents the amyloidogenic cleavage of APP and the formation of amyloid plaques in AD mouse models. Thus, the decreased activation of Erks and c-jun by hNGFP61S/ R100E would uncouple their involvement in a positive feedback neurodegenerative loop and facilitate the down-regulation of the effects by the aberrant APP processing. Further studies are required at more later stages of neurodegeneration, when conflicting results about the “benefits” of Erks activation have been reported. The possibility of hNGFP61S/R100E acting directly on APP processing and its direct consequences, such as the vicious cycle linking Ab to the proNGF/NGF balance should also be considered for future investigation. In this respect, it should be noted that APPxPS1 mice show a defect in NGF retrograde axonal transport by cholinergic neurons.
Following prolonged CIE exposure, increases in NMDAR number may transition to alterations in NMDA receptor
The goal of the present study was to determine whether chronic alcohol exposure altered the plasticity of the mPFC. Using a mouse model in which chronic alcohol dependence is induced by repeated cycles of exposure to alcohol vapors, we observed that chronic alcohol exposure lead to persistent increases in NMDA/AMPA current ratio at glutamatergic synapses of layer V pyramidal neurons in mPFC slices. This increase was due to a selective enhancement of NMDA currents that persisted for at least 1 week of withdrawal. We also observed an increase in expression of NR1 and NR2B Pimozide subunits of the NMDA receptor in the insoluble PSD fraction, but this increase was more transient and was no longer observed after 1 week of withdrawal. In contrast to changes in NMDA receptors and currents, CIE exposure did not alter AMPA currents or expression of AMPA GluR1 subunits. CIE exposure also did not alter preFolinic acid calcium salt pentahydrate synaptic glutamate release as there was no change in mEPSC frequency. We also used diolistic labeling procedures to examine dendritic spines and found that while chronic ethanol did not alter the overall density of spines on basal dendrites of deep-layer pyramidal neurons, there was a significant increase in the number of mature spines that was still present 1 week after withdrawal from the last vapor inhalation exposure. As a direct measure of synaptic plasticity, we examined STDP in the acute slice preparation and found that CIE exposure was associated with an aberrant form of enhanced NMDARmediated plasticity. Finally, we used a PFC-dependent task that assesses different components of executive function and found that while CIE exposure did not alter acquisition or recall of a previously learned strategy, it did attenuate the ability of mice to adjust their strategy in response to changing task rules. Taken together, these results indicate that CIE exposure alters structural, functional and behavioral plasticity of the mPFC. Previous patchclamp slice electrophysiology studies have shown that acute ethanol inhibits NMDA currents in the mPFC and reduces NMDA-dependent Up-states that underlie persistent activity in this brain region. Following chronic exposure, NMDARs adapt to the inhibitory effects of alcohol by increasing their excitatory activity via enhanced expression at the synapse. In the present study, we observed similar changes in the mPFC of adult mice. Thus, the redistribution of NMDARs to the synapse may sensitize the synapse to subsequent synaptic plasticity events. However, an unexpected observation in the present study was the apparent mismatch in the persistence of CIEinduced increase in synaptic expression of NMDA receptors compared to synaptic NMDA currents. Using Western blotting procedures, we observed a transient elevation of synaptic NR1 and NR2B subunits that returned to baseline levels after 1-week of withdrawal, while electrophysiological measurement of synaptic NMDA currents showed they remained increased after 1-week of withdrawal. The reason for this discrepancy is not clear, but may relate to methodological considerations. For example, while electrophysiological recordings were restricted to layer V pyramidal neurons in the prelimbic subregion of the mPFC, Western blotting was carried out using tissue punches that included not only all layers of the prelimbic cortex, but also portions of the subregions surrounding the prelimbic PFC. Layer-specific effects on synaptic transmission have been observed for several drugs of abuse including alcohol. Furthermore, function with a return to baseline density so as to allow for subsequent plasticity events.
Low degrees with only a small proportion of components interacting with the multiple partners
The prediction of drug-target interactions can be directly applied to completing the genome annotations, investigating the drug Dexrazoxane hydrochloride specificity and promiscuity, and finding the targets for diseases. However, the overall pattern of the interaction interface between the chemical space and biological systems is too large and complex to be captured. For simplicity, the enzyme which has been extensively studied as a class of important drug target family was selected here to illustrate our models’ applications of predicting the potential drug-target interactions. A total of 175 enzymes in the DrugBank database were matched with each of 6511 drugs to conduct the comprehensive drug-target interaction prediction using the general RF Model I. Interestingly, this demonstrates that only a few families of enzymes and drugs account for the top scoring interactions, which is completely supported by a previous model LOUREIRIN-B established based on the bipartite graph learning algorithm. Meanwhile, the results also demonstrate that our RF approach offers better predictions for proteins/chemicals that have been extensively studied and for which many ligands/ receptors are known. These results further imply that our proposed methods are able to learn, i.e., the more information is provided, the better the prediction. Here, we take the top 10 scoring novel interactions as examples to illustrate the above findings. As shown in Table 3, compound Bromfenac is predicted to act on Prostaglandin G/H synthase 1 with a score of 0.992. Actually, this interaction has been confirmed and was annotated in DrugBank database. For Asparagine synthetase, a new ligand Indomethacin is predicted to bind to it with the score of 0.984, which might be hinted by an indirect experiment in which the Asparagine synthetase expression level was indeed upregulated by this compound. Additionally, Oxyphenbutazone, as a well-known nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent, binds to the cyclooxygenase Prostaglandin G/H synthase 1 and Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2 with the same binding scores of 0.982. This is supported by the fact that the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could produce therapeutic activities through the inhibition of cyclooxygenase. With no exception, for all the remaining interactions, the predicted ligands of certain receptors are invariably similar in structure with those confirmed ligands as mentioned above. All these outcomes enhance the strength of our proposed methods for realistic drugtarget interaction prediction application. Subsequently, a comprehensive network describing the drugtarget interactions was constructed. In order to make it clear and simple, the top 500 scoring drug-target interactions were used to generate a bipartite graph of drug-target interactions for illustrating the complex relationships between drugs and enzymes, in which a compound and a protein are connected to each other if the protein is a predicted target of the compound. Figure 7 shows a global view of this network with color and shape-coded nodes. To explore the topological and global properties of this drug-target network, the centralization, heterogeneity and node degree distribution were analyzed. The centralization and heterogeneity analysis shows the network centralization and heterogeneity degrees are 0.463 and 3.661, respectively, indicating that a few nodes are more central that the other ones in this net, i.e., the drugtarget space is biased toward certain compounds and proteins.